Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Women on Indian boards and market performance: a role-congruity theory perspective

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Asian Business & Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing on role-congruity theory, we explore the role of female board members in Indian firms. We find that the impact of female board members on market performance is positive for widely held high-tech firms, but negative in non-high-tech firms and high-tech firms that are family-controlled. Our results suggest that the relationship between female representation on Indian boards and market performance hinges on the (in)congruity between societally defined female gender roles and the expected characteristics of leadership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In a robustness test, we use the definition of Team Lease (2016) to classify the high-tech and non-high-tech samples.

  2. The three-digit SIC code indicates sector group at a relatively smaller level, and the two-digit code at a broader level.

References

  • Abdullah, Shamsul N., Ku Nor Izah Ku Ismail, and Lilac Nachum. 2016. Does having women on boards create value? The impact of societal perceptions and corporate governance in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal 37 (3): 466–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Renee B., and Daniel Ferreira. 2009. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics 94 (2): 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Susan M., Atul Gupta, and John D. Leeth. 2009. Are female executives over-represented in precarious leadership positions? British Journal of Management 20 (1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahern, Kenneth R., and Amy K. Dittmar. 2012. The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (1): 137–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, Manuel, and Stephen Bond. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balachandra, Lakshmi, Anthony R. Briggs, Kimberley Eddleston, and Candida Brush. 2013. Pitch like a man: Gender stereotypes and entrepreneur pitch success. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship 33 (8): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkin, David B., Gideon D. Markman, and Luis R. Gomez-Mejia. 2000. Is CEO play in high technology firms related to innovation? Academy of Management Journal 43 (6): 1118–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S. 1977. Investment performance of common stocks in relation to their price- earnings ratios: A test of the efficient market hypothesis. Journal of Finance 32 (3): 663–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Philip G., and Eli Ofek. 1995. Diversification’s effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics 37 (1): 39–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M. 1979. Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. Social Forces 58 (2): 677–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohren, ØYvind, and R.Oystein Strom. 2010. Governance and politics: Regulating independence and diversity in the board room. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 37 (9): 1281–1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, Barry, and Susan M. Collins. 2007. Accounting for growth: Comparing China and India. Journal of Economic Perspectives 22 (1): 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, Garry D., Igor Filatotchev, Salim Chahine, and Mike Wright. 2010. Governance, ownership structure and performance of IPO firms: The impact of different types of private equity investors and institutional environments. Strategic Management Journal 31 (5): 491–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, Susan F., Stephen J. Sauer, and Melissa C. Thomas-Hunt. 2009. The evolving manager stereotype: The effects of industry gender typing on performance expectations for leaders and their teams. Psychology of Women Quarterly 33 (4): 419–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Kevin, and Antonio Mínguez-Vera. 2008. Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (3): 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, David A., Frank D’Souza, Betty J. Simkins, and W. Garry Simpson. 2010. The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review 18 (5): 396–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, David A., Betty Simkins, and W. Garry Simpson. 2003. Corporate governance, board diversity and firm value. Financial Review 38 (1): 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst. 2015. Catalyst report on Women in workforce in India. http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-workforce-india#footnote26_x3wwml4. Accessed 4 January 2018.

  • Chu, Wenyi. 2009. The influence of family ownership on SME performance: Evidence from public firms in Taiwan. Small Business Economics 33 (3): 353–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conyon, Martin J., and Lerong He. 2017. Firm performance and boardroom gender diversity: A quantile regression approach. Journal of Business Research 79: 198–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, Heather K., and Michael J. Burke. 2000. Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior 56 (2): 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dezso, Cristian L., and David Gaddis Ross. 2012. Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal 33 (9): 1072–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durnev, Art, Randall Morck, and Bernard Yeung. 2004. Value-enhancing capital budgeting and firm-specific stock return variation. Journal of Finance 59 (1): 65–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, Alice H., and Steven J. Karau. 2002. Role-congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 109 (3): 573–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddleston, Kimberly A., Jamie J. Ladge, Cheryl Mitteness, and Lakshmi Balachandra. 2016. Do you see what i see? Signaling effects of gender and firm characteristics on financing entrepreneurial ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 40 (3): 489–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EgonZehnder 2017. 2016 EgonZehnder Global board diversity analysis. https://www.egonzehnder.com/files/2016_gbda_digital.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2018.

  • Faccio, Mara, Maria-Teresa Marchica, and Roberto Mura. 2016. CEO gender and corporate risk-taking. CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance 39: 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francoeur, Claude, Real Labelle, and Bernard Sinclair-Desgagne. 2008. Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (1): 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, Geetika, Shefali Nandan, and Piyali Ghosh. 2011. A socio-cultural perspective on father-daughter succession in family business in India. In Father-daughter succession in family business: A cross-cultural perspective, ed. Daphne Halkias, Paul W. Thurman, Celina Smith, and Robert S. Nason, 35–44. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Vishal K., Daniel B. Turban, S. Arzu Wasti, and Arijit Sikdar. 2009. The role of gender stereotypes in perceptions of entrepreneurs and intentions to become an entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 33 (2): 397–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S.Alexander, Michelle K. Ryan, Clara Kulich, Grezegorz Trojanowski, and Cate Atkins. 2010. Investing with prejudice: The relationship between women’s presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. British Journal of Management 21 (2): 484–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, James J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 (1): 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, Amy J., Albert A. Cannella, and Ira C. Harris. 2002. Women and racial minorities in boardrooms: How do directors differ? Journal of Management 28 (6): 747–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoobler, Jenny M., Courtney R. Masterson, Stella M. Nkomo, and Eric J. Michel. 2016. The business case for women leaders: Meta-analysis, research critique, and path forward. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Jiekun, and Darren J. Kisgen. 2013. Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives? Journal of Financial Economics 108 (3): 822–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackling, Beverley, and Shireenjit Johl. 2009. Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review 17 (4): 492–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jindal, Varun, and Manju Jaiswall. 2015. Board diversity and firm performance influenced by ownership concentration: Evidence from India. http://financelab.iimcal.ac.in/resdoc/WPS%20765.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2018.

  • Jhunjhunwala, Shital, and R.K. Mishra. 2012. Board diversity and corporate performance: The Indian evidence. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance 11 (3): 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, William Q., Michael A. Witt, Alessandro Zattoni, Till Talaulicar, Jean Jinghan Chen, Krista Lewellyn, Hu Helen Wei, Dhirendra Shukla, Robert G. Bell, Jonas Gabrielsson, Felix Lopez, Sibel Yamak, Yves Fassin, Daniel McCarthy, Jose Luis Rivas, Stav Fainshmidt, and Hans Van Ees. 2015. Corporate governance and IPO underpricing in a cross-national sample: A multilevel knowledge-based view. Strategic Management Journal 36 (8): 1174–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Eugene, David K. Ding, and Charlie Charoenwong. 2010. Investor reaction to women directors. Journal of Business Research 63 (6): 888–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko, Ia, Lindsey Kotrba, and Adam Roebuck. 2015. Leaders as males? The role of industry gender composition. Sex Roles 72 (7–8): 294–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Peggy M., and Erika Hayes James. 2007. She’-e-os: Gender effects and investor reactions to the announcements of top executive appointments. Strategic Management Journal 28 (3): 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Maurice, Kai Li, and Feng Zhang. 2014. Director gender and mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance 28: 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lussier, Robert N., and Matthew C. Sonfield. 2012. Family businesses’ succession planning: a seven-country comparison. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 19 (1): 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Ugedo, Juan Francisco, and Antonio Minguez-Vera. 2014. Firm performance and women on the board: Evidence from Spanish small and medium-sized enterprises. Feminist Economics 20 (3): 136–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinova, Sophia V., Chunyan Peng, Natalia Lorinkova, Linn Van Dyne, and Dan Chiaburu. 2015. Change-oriented behavior: A meta-analysis of individual and job design predictors. Journal of Vocational Behavior 88 (June): 104–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEIT. 2017. Ministry of electronics and information technology fact sheet of IT & BPM industry. http://meity.gov.in/content/fact-sheet-it-bpm-industry. Accessed 4 January 2018.

  • Miller, Toyah, and María del Carmen Triana. 2009. Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies 46 (5): 755–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, Carol. 2005. The scientific gender gap should be understood comparatively. Anthropology News 46 (3): 4–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opler, Tim C., and Sheridan Titman. 1994. Financial distress and corporate performance. Journal of Finance 49 (3): 1015–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, Reena. 2008. Working the night shift: Women’s employment in the transnational call center industry. PhD Diss., University of Texas at Austin.

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Gerlad R. Salancik. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Domínguez, Luis, Isabel-María García-Sánchez, and Isabel Gallego-Álvarez. 2012. Explanatory factors of the relationship between gender diversity and corporate performance. European Journal of Law and Economics 33 (3): 603–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, Fabrizio, and Richard J. Cebula. 2015. Stock market reactions to announcements of the board of directors: Evidence from Italy. Applied Economics 47 (20): 2102–2118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeed, Abubakr, Yacine Belghitar, and Amna Yousaf. 2016. Firm-level Determinants of gender diversity in the boardrooms: Evidence from some emerging economies. International Business Review 25 (5): 1076–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeed, Abubakr, and Suma Athreye. 2014. Internal capital markets and outward foreign investment from India and China. In International business, institutions and performance after the financial crisis, ed. Yama Temouri, and Chris Jones, 93–108. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saeed, Abubakr, and Muhammad Sameer. 2017. Impact of board gender diversity on dividend payments: Evidence from some emerging economies. International Business Review 26 (6): 1100–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanan, Neeti Khetarpal. 2016. Board gender diversity and firm performance: Evidence from India. Asian Journal of Business Ethics 5 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, Jayati, and Ekta Selarka. 2016. Women on board and performance of family firms: Evidence from India. http://www.igidr.ac.in/pdf/publication/WP-2015-026.pdf. Accessed 27 August 2017.

  • Shannon, C.E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27 (3): 379–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharan, Sunil. 2017. The Muslim question. Times of India. http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/strategic-insights/the-muslim-question-2/. Accessed 29 August 2017.

  • Sila, Vathunyoo, Angelica Gonzalez, and Jens Hagendorff. 2016. Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity really affect firm risk? Journal of Corporate Finance 36: 26–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Deeksha, and Andrew Delios. 2017. Corporate governance, board networks and growth in domestic and international markets: Evidence from India. Journal of World Business 52 (5): 615–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stickney, Clyde, Paul Brown, and James Wahlen. 2007. Financial reporting, financial statement analysis and valuation: A strategic perspective, 6th ed. Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talapatra, Debjani. 2010. Women in family businesses in India. http://www.womensweb.in/articles/takeover-women-in-family-businesses/. Accessed 4 January 2018. .

  • Terjesen, Siri, Ruth V. Aguilera, and Ruth Lorenz. 2015. Legislating a woman’s seat on the board: Institutional factors driving gender quotas for boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics 128 (2): 233–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Team Lease. 2016. Gender diversity in the workplace. http://www.teamlease.com/sites/default/files/resources/Gender%20Diversity%20Report.pdf. Accessed 27 August 2017.

  • Tobin, James. 1969. A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 1 (1): 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, Jenny Wu. 2011. Selection bias and econometric remedies in accounting and finance research. Journal of Accounting Literature 29 (1): 31–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walia, Shelly. 2015. India’s corporate boards still ignore hiring mandates in favor of nepotism. https://qz.com/565025/putting-family-first-indias-corporate-boards-flout-mandate-on-independent-directors/. Accessed 23 November, 2017.

  • Wharton. 2009. New ‘Right-hand Men’: The growing role of women in Indian family business. http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/new-right-hand-men-the-growing-role-of-women-in-indian-family-business/. Accessed 23 November, 2017.

  • Winters, L.Alan, and Shahid Yusuf. 2007. Dancing with giants: China, India, and the global economy. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wintoki, M.Babajidi, James S. Linck, and Jeffry M. Netter. 2012. Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 105 (3): 581–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Park Road, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan

    Syed Shafqat Mukarram, Abubakr Saeed & Muhammad Mustafa Raziq

  2. Lebow College of Business, Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA

    Shawkat Hammoudeh

Authors
  1. Syed Shafqat Mukarram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abubakr Saeed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shawkat Hammoudeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muhammad Mustafa Raziq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abubakr Saeed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mukarram, S.S., Saeed, A., Hammoudeh, S. et al. Women on Indian boards and market performance: a role-congruity theory perspective. Asian Bus Manage 17, 4–36 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-018-0030-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-018-0030-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation